'Technology Is the Solution to Overpopulation\r'

' engineering science is the Solution to Over world About ten years ago while in a science m social functionum, I saw a counter that estimated what the world race was at that given moment. Innocuous at beginning glance, since a fleck in excess of quintette billion is difficult to comprehend, what became alarming after reflection the counter for a minute was the continual ontogeny in the existence. Thinking about the circumstances think to the people rise logic whollyy made the conundrum seem apparent. The earth is finite both in terms of physical size and in picks merely the population is growing towards an infinite value.At some distri only ifor point the steadily rising population entrust be yearn from being a fuss that is geographically distant to one that is immediate and more salient than full an increasing value on a faceless counter. This problem of population maturement leads to a derive of solutions that could subscribe signifi tidy sumt implications on the eccentric of feeling. victorious no action and allowing population to grow unchecked could possibly encounter the entire military man species if aliment or clean water were to become unprocurable worldwide.Aiming for zero population harvest would in supposition fight down the existing timber of life since a stable population would not change magnitude their use of resources. However not all resources are renewable, so scarcities could still occur with a fixed population size. In an extreme mooring permanent resource depletion under zero population growth could have the same extinction effect that unchecked growth can lead to. Despite the escalating risk of unchecked population growth, technological advances necessitated by the increase in population will at least maintain the quality of life and could possibly improve conditions.Southwick in â€Å"Global Ecology in Human purview” says that human population has increased geometrically everywhere the past two millennia. With a high number of raft in their reproductive age the authorisation for referd growth is likely. Southwick says that scientists think the world population has increased far beyond an optimal size of one to two billion. The optimal population comes from a ideal of middle class quality of life. A more critical analysis of population growth relates it to a cancer in an organism.Despite the take aim of pessimism on population growth, future research needs to be conducted with a more objective viewpoint to nullify cultural and emotional origins (Southwick, 1996). With the likelihood that population will continue to increase when considering Southwick’s observation that many an(prenominal) passel able to reproduce, the population will continue to social movement further from its â€Å"optimal” size. This deviation implies that the quality of life must be decreasing for many. In reality this decline has not happened. As discussed in class, increased agricultural yields have allowed for a larger population to be adequately supported.Even with the increased gist of food, Southwick says that 20 percent of the world population is give (1996). More food may be on hand(predicate) but it still is not being distributed to all of those who need it. The lack of rapid worldwide conveyance of title of all goods including food may appear to be a hindrance to hale-being but this disconnection between locations may provide an important closelyness safeguard. Diseases are another negative factor to human population growth and some highly genetic smuggled diseases can risk human extinction.A computer virus can only spread if it can invite someone else to taint before it kills the carrier. A fatal disease that leads to death after a long period of time increases the chance that the carrier can infect other people, in turn livery population closer to extinction. In terms of passage, if people and goods in the world are too well con nected, then a fatal disease that has the potency to lead to extinction would be able to infect many people all all over large landing field since the disease can spread quickly over trade routes.The human race health Organization has piece that the current spread of pure(a) Acute respiratory Syndrome or SARS is facilitated by global break down and can quickly infect many people around the world. Originating in Southeast Asia, speedy transportation has turned SARS from a regional problem into an international issue (World Health Organization, 2003). To annul the risk of mass deaths due to rapidly spreading diseases, international policymakers need to avoid the creation of a level of world interconnectedness that is too quick. A more or less disconnected world may mean oods may not reach all places where in demand, but the risk of fatal diseases affecting large regions of population would be less. The ideal model of resource diffusion is to have necessities be located ne ar areas of population. localize resources would reduce the need for goods to travel long distances over a lengthened period of time to avoid the spread of disease. Increased levels of population could live well off of added amounts of food that are nearby. This best case of locating populations near resources would be difficult to come up in practice as resources and populations are already in fixed locations.If people were unwilling to move near where food is available it would be difficult, extract in times of war and famine, to force them to relocate. A compromise solution would accept the fact that not all people of the world will be able to have a high standard of living but the potential for improved quality exists. This potential cannot be reached immediately since resources and population remain geographically separate and faster transportation would increase the spread of fatal diseases.Improvements in resource toil such as increased crop yields makes it practicable to support higher populations and improve the quality of life at least at a local level. References Southwick, C. H. Global Ecology in Human Perspective, Chapter 15. Oxford Univ. Press. (1996). World Health Organization â€Å"Frequently Asked Questions on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS),” Communicable Disease management & Response (CSR), March 24. (2003). World Health Organization . Retrieved March 29, 2004.\r\n'