Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Violates The Second Amendment of the Constitution :: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms

The U.S. should non have particle accelerator control laws. The endorse Amendment to the Constitution states that, A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a forgive state, the right of the people to forbear and bear arms shall not be infringed. This amendment has been around since 1791, and in that location has been gun control almost as extensive as its been around. The National Rifle Association is an advocate of the Second Amendment and an obstructer of those who propose restrictions on guns. Even Presidents Reagan and Bush are members, and Nixon, Eisenhower, and Kennedy were also members. why do people feel the need to own a side arm? One reason is heritage. For as long as this country has been around, there have been gun owners, to fight themselves and to hunt for food. Buying, owning, or carrying a pistol doesnt hurt anyone. Until a person commits a crime, he/she is free to read what he/she wants to do. Even if guns were completely banned from th e U.S.A., people would still reckon a way to get them. Criminals would get guns. They would have their way, and there would be nothing we could do about it. We would have no way to defend ourselves. What is gun control to you? To me, it is the unconstitutional regulation and banning of guns to try to keep the crime rates in this country down. Does it work? Some gun laws are okay and they may work to some extent, but not to the extent that was intended. As for most of these gun laws such as the Brady Law, it serves no purpose. It is only there to make our lawmaking bodies and those of us who are in like manner naive to see the truth feel better. Do you really conceptualize that the Brady Law keeps handguns out of the hands of criminals?