Marketing Strategy for Low Income Consumers

tradeing outline for minor Income Consumersafter evaluating the gaucherie Study Unilever in Brazil(1997-2007) tradeplace placeing Strategies for blue-income consumers the fol sufferinging points are credible.After the colossal recession stoppage Brazils economy is ontogeny and that is reflected on consumers purchasing power(Increased by 27% for the poorest 10%) and market is excessively suppuration with 17% annual rate.After analysing unhomogeneous survival of the fittests, I think it would be beneficial for Unilever to choose a system for Market reading by introducing existing post from its Latin Ameri arouse portfolio like Ala. bleak Marketing Mix should consist Good Quality, Low Price, Attractive packaging, Specialized Distribution system and promotional material. Changes in a natural selling dodge is urgently required for Unilever as PG is genuinely aggressively activated (By acquisition, re-imagining and re-positioning of brands.)Ala should be tolld $1.55 /Kg (Approx) and should be launched in both box and sachet packing. Sachet packing impart be offered with uncaring extra quantity due to cheap packaing cost. We hindquarters introduce 2kg 3kg bags with attractive price.Unilever should introduce a new dissemination management system that includes both generalist Wholesaler and Specialized Distributors.Unilever need to build send relationship with 75,000 small shops by grownup credit and incentive.Unilever also be having an option to start increase of Ala in NE constituent, as government is providing lot of taxation Incentives that will help Unilever to produce at low cost.Consumer BehaviourLike any other country Brazilian consumers also have their give beliefs, values and lifestyle. Washing is one of the major activity for women in NE and various sentiments and emotions like pride, care, amusement and satisfaction are attached to it.Washing is a medium of socializing for women in NE, because only 28% household own a laping machine and more or lessly they wash their clothes in a public laundry, river or pond. Women in NE wash clothes using laundry soap and or so 73% thinks that for cleaning clothes bleach is necessary. Current usage of detergent powder is just for giving pricey smell to clothes.Decision making process for buying a detergent powder in NE is establish on several criteria as shown in skirt 1. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.155) card 1 military rank CriteriaSource Exhibit 5 Unilever in Brazil Case Study30% (51.06 Million) of Brazils population earn less than $ one hundred twenty-five a month. More specifically 25.4miliion in NE and 25.62 Million in the SE.NE consumers are very price sensitive.Diagram 1Around 40% of Northeast population is illiterate and they generally buy products on the recommendation of local shopkeepers, word of mouth, television advertisements, visual identity and graphics. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.158)In spite of low Income, NE consumers are very self-importance g azeed and sensitive about their social status and cleanliness, so they wash clothes more frequently 5 times a week compare to 3.9 times a week in SE. Washing can be considered as Ego need (Higher-Level Need) for NE consumers correspond to Maslows Hierarchy of Needs. Abraham Maslow (1970) in his study of Consumer behavior proposed a Hierarchy of Needs and related harvest-times. And refereed Self esteem as Ego based need. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.161)Physiological Need (Water, Food, Sleep)Safety Need (Security, Shelter)Belongingness (Love, Friendship, relationships)Ego Needs (Prestige, status, self esteem)Self ActualizationHigher -Level NeedsLower-Level NeedsNE Customers needs with respect to washing is more Ego based (Pride, Self Esteem Status)Diagram 2 Maslows Hierarchy of Needs and related produces (Maslow, 1970)Adapted and change from Solomon et al (2009), Marketing Real People,Real Decisions,Page 161.Market AnalysisMajor Brands in MarketUnilever is a Market leader in Brazils detergent powder market with 81% Market serving followed by PG with 15% market Other local brands(4%). In Northeast region Unilever is having 75% market share followed by PG 17.5% and others with 7.5% market share.NE Detergent powder market is growing with 17% annual suppuration.Table 2 Main Players in NE Detergent MarketSource Exhibit 7 Unilever in Brazil Case StudyBut unlike NE Detergent powder market, Laundry market ($102 Million, 81,250 tons) is totally different and growing with 6% annual growth, Unilever is a market leader in Laundry soap market as healthful with one brand Minerva (19% market share) and major competitor for Unilever is ASA with a brand Bem-te-vi (11% market share).Table 3 Main Players in NE Laundry Soap MarketSource Exhibit 7 Unilever in Brazil Case StudyStrategic Competitive AnalysisUnilever has segmented market by geo-demographic air division based on Income(High Income Low Income) and geographic locations (SE NE) and currently targeting the high in come consumers in SE.(Solomon et al, 2009 p.215-220)Unilever has positioned their products in market with respect to various key features of products like Omo with remove stain with low quantity, Minerva with Emotional appeal and Pleasant smell and Campeiro with Low cost.Whereas PG has started reacting very aggressively after taking in consideration of growing Brazils economy by acquiring Quanto, Odd Faces and Pop from Bomrill. And after making nigh manufacturing changes, launched Quanto as Ace, Odd Faces as Bold and unploughed Pop (the low price brand) unchanged. PG positioned their products like Ace with Whiteness, Bold with Softness and Pop with low cost.Table 4 Current Strategies of Various BrandsASA (Local Brazillian Comoany), also segmented market by geo-demographic and currently targeting Low income consumers in NE. ASA positioned its brand (Invicto) in market by focusing the low income consumers. Invicto is one of the key competitor of Campeiro in low income consumer segme nt.After analysing the complete market situation, I found that currently PG is the some active role player of the market though PGs market share is not much high (As they acquired all the three brands this year.). So I think PG will give very tough competition to Unilever in a long run. get up AnalysisThe SWOT analysis is the method of understanding Internal and External environment of an organic law (Kotler 2000, Page 46 and Solomon et al, 2009 p.66). SWOT analysis of Unilever provides a summary of Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.StrengthsThreatsOpportunitiesWeaknessesInternal EnvironmentsExternal EnvironmentsDiagram 1 SWOT AnalysisInternal EnvironmentStrengthsGood Market reputation with 75% market share.High grapheme productsDifferentiated growthsBrand AwarenessWeaknessesDemographic market SegmentationWeak distribution system deficiency of Expertise in Customer relationship ManagementWeek RD and marketing expertiseExternal EnvironmentOpportunitiesNE is a ver y high potential market (48 million).NE detergent powder Market is growing by 17% annual growth.Unilever can capture NE low income market to enrol first in it.Increase in purchasing power of poorest 10% consumers.Brazilian government providing tax incentives for encouraging investment in NE.NE women wash clothes more frequent then SE, so it leads to higher consumption.ThreatsEconomic downturn might affect the growth and sales.PGs RD and Marketing ExpertiseCannibalizationLocal NE detergent manufacturers.Marketing StrategySegmentationDiagram 2 Distribution of companionable ClassesNortheast southeast Unilever had segmented the complete Brazilian market into two segments based on location and Income (demographic Segmentation). (Solomon et al, 2009 p.215-220) But I think Unilever need to create a new segment that will focus consumer in Social class E- E+, because we have 53% (25.44 million) in NE and 21% (25.62 million) in SE. Both the region is having equal number of low income cons umers (as per percentage of total population in region). So this new segmentation will target not only NE low income consumer but SEs low income consumers as hearty (30% (50.70 Million) of Overall Brazil population).Table 5 Distribution of population as per social classesSource Exhibit 2 Unilever in Brazil Case StudyTargeting MarketTill now Unilever is a Market leader by targeting High Income Consumer segment (SE). For entering into Low income consumer market, Unilever need to prepare and implement a new targeting strategy because its a very huge market segment (53% NE and 21% SE). So what will be the Unilevers possible targeting strategy?Igor Ansoff (1957) in his study on Strategies of diversification suggested a marketing tool (Market growth matrix) and as per Ansoffs market growth matrix, Unilever is having two potential options out of four Unilever is targeting new market segment, so option 12 automatically neglected. (Ansoff, 1957 p.113) animated harvest New ProductMarket PenetrationDiversificationMarket breedingProduct DevelopmentUnilever can launch a Completely New Product in NE after RD and according to NE customers need.Unilever can Re-position existing brands or launch brand from existing international portfolio. Market.Diagram 3 Ansoffs Market Growth MatrixAdapted and modified from Ansoff ,(1965), Corporate Strategy ,Page 109.Existing Product in Existing Market (Market Penetration) Unilever is already having 87% (National Average is 81%) market share in SE with three brands.New Product in Existing Market (Product Development) Unilever is a market leader in SE higher Income segment, so no need to launch Ala.Existing Product in New Market (Market Development) Market Development can be the best strategy for Unilever in current scenario because Unilever is already having a good brand image in NE. Unilevers main dispute is to develop a market and try to change the washing habit of Low Income consumers by switching them to detergent powder from laundry soap.New Product in New Market (Diversification) Diversification is the most risky option compared to the others because we are moving into the market with a New Product in which phoner is having very little or no experience.Market PenetrationProduct DevelopmentMarket DevelopmentDiversificationLow RiskHigh RiskDiagram 4 Risk associated with Market strategiesIn the current situation Unilever should choose the 3rd Option (Market Development), because Unilevers existing market (SE) is already developed with 87% Market Share (Option 12) and currently Unilever is looking for expand his business in NE and to capture low income consumer in SE as well.What all options are currently obtainable to Unilever in Market development?Positioning the Product (Marketing Mix)PositioningPositioning New Brand in NE market by fulfilling customers needDistributionSpecialized DistributionHigh availabilityPriceLow Price (affordable)ProductFulfill NE Consumers needGood SmellLow Price High Qualit y advancementTV AdvertisementsSponsoring local EventsSample distributionDiagram 5 Marketing MixAdapted and modified from Ansoff , Lars Perner, 2010 http//www.consumerpsychologist.com/cb_Segmentation.html.Product StrategiesUnilever is having four options to position Product in NE market.Brand Extension of Omo (A cheaper version of Omo) It is a very risky option and will lead to high cannibalization. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.290)Re-positioning Minerva It can be an option but Minerva is a bit costly product ($2.40 WP) for Low income consumers and reducing price and compromising in Quality can damage a brand image and lead to cannibalization.Re-positioning/Brand Extension Campeiro Camperio is available in the market since 1984 and having just 6% market share. It is currently positioned as a Cheap Low Quality product in NE consumers, so Re-positioning of Campeiro is very time taking and a costly affair. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.228)Introduce a brand from the international portfolio Without taking risk with existing brands, this can be a potential option for Unilever to introduce a new brand from its international portfolio like Nevex, Ala or Marsella (Latin America). I think It can be Ala (Means WING in Portuguese), only brand that is having a meaningful name. Ala can be positions amid Minerva and Campeiro in terms of quality and below Campeiro in terms of price by effective marketing planning.Since NE consumers like Omo very much and currently use detergent powder just for good smell, so the fragrance of the Ala should be same as Omo and if possible Unilever should launch Ala in 2 or 3 different fragrances.Alas Packaging should be Proper, Attractive and cost effective packaging. Ala should be available in the market in a pack of 1kg, 500gm in both cardboard pack and tensile pack (Save detergent from moisture) and 250 gm 100gm in plastic sachets. Plastic sachet cost just 30% of unlifelike pack, so Unilever can offer consumers an additional quantity in plastic bags in same price. Ala will be priced between $1.5 and $1.6 per Kg, so we can easily offer an extra 20% to 25% quantity in plastic bags as Cardboard box cost $0.35 and Plastic Pack $0.10. (Solomon et al, 2009 p. 307 and Kotler, 2009 p.195)Table 6 Product Packing Matrix*Extra Quantity on plastic bag because of low cost of packagingConsumers always get attracted by special offers and additional quantity of product and since Unilever is the pioneer in the market, it will help Unilever to achieve good market share.While launching Ala, we can give some introductory offers like buy 1kg and get 500gm and 2kg and get 1kg shift.Pricing StrategiesCurrently Unilever has priced (Whole Sale) product Omo with 22.45%, Minerva with 11.63% and Campeiro with 9.68% profit. Ala will also be priced with 9.15% (Approx) profit to wholesalers at $1.55 (Approx) that will be the lowest priced detergent powder available in the market as per the data available in case study. Best quality product in the lowest co st will be the USP for this Ala. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.370-374)Table 7 Cost gain ground Calculation MatrixSource Exhibit 10 Unilever in Brazil Case StudyPlastic Sachet packing reduces total cost of employment by 25%, but NE consumers are having special attachment with boxes and Plastic Sachet Packed Product is assumed as low quality product. So we will introduce Ala in both box and plastic sachet packing where on the latter we give 25% extra quantity.Table 8 Profit difference in Box Sachet Packing*will offer 25% extra quantityPromotion StrategiesCurrently Unilevers promotion strategy is 70% above-the-line and 30% below-the-line. But for Ala it need to be changed to 40% above-the-line and 60% below-the- line, as low income consumers more attracted and relies on word of mouth publicity, small shop displays, holdings, sample distribution, free gifts etc. But moving towards below-the-line promotion not only Unilever can achieve better results in a low income consumer market but ca n also save money on promotions. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.37, 398-406)Ala should be promoted with the key messages like best quality, good smell, Care, Pride and self esteem. Ala will Packed in bright box and sachet with the indication of quality and good fragrance by showing flowers etc.Point of corrupt also need to be modified accordingly because several time consumer make decision changes by viewing point of purchase promotion and shopkeepers advice. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.167) Shopkeepers also need to be taken in combine by providing credit and incentive.Target Audience (Women between 20 -50 years)Budget and Promotion Objective ($0.20/kg and Emotional appeal (Like Care, Pride and Good Smell)Designing AdvertisementMedia Type (TV, Outdoor Advertising, Public transaction and Sales Promotion by sample distribution, shop displays etc).Evaluation of PromotionDiagram 6 promotional Strategy developmentAdapted and modified from Solomon et al ,(2009), Marketing Real People Real Decesion ,Page 109.Distribution StrategiesThe most important thing to make any product successful and to increase revenue, sales and market share is a good distribution system.You cant sell, what isnt there7(Solomon et al, 2009, Page 494)With the Ala, Unilever is targeting to gain business in a low income consumer market that will be possible only when the product will be available on traditional retail shops (Main point of purchase for Low income consumers).For targeting the high income consumers in the big supermarket Unilevers current distribution system is well sufficient but to target low income consumers Unilever should take help from specialized distributors as well. (Solomon et al, 2009 p.498-500)Unilever need to make some changes in the distribution system by creating the proper mix of Generalist Specialized distributors, so the product will be available at as many as locations possible. New distribution mix can be applied in SE as well because there are also 21% of low income con sumers. New distribution system will not only captures more ground area but also reduce the cost of distribution.